Length and thickness of bamboo internodes: a beautiful curve
Here is a simple experiment about bamboo anatomy. The measurements are not thoroughly done, hence the results are not yet very robust. However, the first results already show quite an inspiring curve unveiling a beautiful natural pattern!
This post tries to follow the scientific format of research sharing, developed over the last centuries: the use of a simple structure for quick reading (introduction, method, results, discussion), the supply of all the details for anyone to be able to reproduce the experiment, and the supply of the dataset for anyone to reuse the results.
- Introduction: objective
- Method: simple measurements
- Results: a beautiful pattern
- Discussion: do you want to try?
Bamboo fibers are very straight in internodes and entangled in nodes. Pole walls tend to be thicker at the bottom of the pole and thinner at the top. These kinds of variations have a significant impact on how the craftsman can work with bamboo and what he can or cannot do with the different sections.
For instance, if a craftsman wants to cut a straight strip, its length will be limited by the length of the internode. Moreover, the strips might tend to be thick for an internode that is close to the bottom of the pole, and thin for an internode that is close to the top of the pole.
Even if many techniques can be used by the craftsman, for instance straightening the strips using heat, understanding closely the structure of bamboo poles can elegantly save time and energy. The craftsman will know better which pole to harvest for a specific use, and fewer steps and tools might then be necessary to reach the final crafted object. Experienced bamboo craftmen already have this knowledge. But for beginners, trying to understand bamboo by observing it is very useful.
From quick observations, the internodes of a bamboo pole seem shorter at the base and longer at the top; and bamboo pole wall seems thicker at the bottom and thinner at the top. Do these dimensions really follow patterns all along the pole, or are they actually hazardous? What might be the shapes of these patterns? And do these patterns depend on other variables, such as species?
Well, let’s have a look at how internode length and wall thickness vary along a bamboo pole!
Method: simple measurements
We harvested a full bamboo pole in northern Taiwan, and measured the length of each internode using a tape measure. We also measured the thickness of the wall at certain points using a ruler.
We started the measurement of internode length at the base of the pole, above the level of the small roots covering the lower node. The measurement was accurate to the nearest centimeter, due to irregularities in the bamboo pole: the limits corresponding to the nodes were not perpendicular to the axis of the pole, but slightly tilted; and the diameter of the pole tended to be larger at the level of nodes than in the internodes. Measurements are hence not very precise but enough to meet our objectives.
We measured the wall thickness at the level of cuts that we did close to 4 nodes. The measurement was accurate to the nearest 0.5 centimeters. As the wall thickness is not always even, we averaged 3 measures taken more or less at equidistance from one another. Measuring the wall thickness for each internode would be ideal, but it would have required to cut the pole in small sections, preventing us to use it for other purposes that we planned!
We also recorded other variables to describe the context of the measurement:
- Date: December 18, 2018
- Location: northern Taiwan (24°50’43.4“N 121°26’07.8”E)
- Species: Phyllostachys reticulate (Chinese: 桂竹)
- Age: unknown, but > 1 year given the lichens developed on the pole.
- Outer diameter at the base of the pole: 7.8 cm (error of about 0.5 cm due to irregularities)
- Full pole: no, some internodes appeared to be lacking at the top, they may have been eaten by animals or insects at a young age.
Results: a beautiful pattern
The bamboo pole contained 53 internodes and measured 13.62 m in total.
The internode length was 10 cm at the base, increased till 38 cm roughly at the middle of the pole, and decreased till 13 cm at the top of the pole. Internodes measured 26 cm on average. The visual representation of the measurements suggests two distinct parts: the lowest internodes length following a logarithmic-like dynamic, and the highest internodes length following a negative exponential-like dynamic! So beautiful. Only bamboo can do this.
The wall thickness decreased from 12.5 mm on average at the base of the pole to 5 mm at the 14th internode. We did 3 measurements for each of the 4 internodes measured, but some dots are merged on the figure, when values were identical. We can infer a rough statistical model from these measurements, to predict the thickness of the wall depending on the location along the bamboo pole. No data was collected for the internodes after the 14th, but the model suggests a potential wall thickness of about 2 mm for the last internode.
Discussion: do you want to try?
These measurements already help in understanding the anatomy of a bamboo pole. However, the dataset is quite small and restricted to only one bamboo, which does not make for our statistical model to be robust, despite its apparently high R2 of about 0.99.
Improvements could be done thanks to (1) a better measurement technique, as well as (2) additional measurements of bamboo poles in other conditions:
The length of each internode could be measured as the average of the longer and shorter lengths between the tilted limits of the internode. The thickness of the wall could be measured systematically at the middle of each internode, instead of close to the nodes, as the wall appear to be thicker close to the nodes. Moreover, measuring several bamboo poles for a given species in a given location, instead of only one, would also improve the reliability of the results.
It is unlikely that internode length or wall thickness vary depending on the age of the bamboo pole, as bamboo does not have any secondary over its lifespan. However, it would be very interesting to see if there might be variations of patterns due to species and location!
Do you also have measurements? Let us know! By combining our works, we could get more interesting results!
No need to have a complete data set, nor all the complementary variables. We can perform interesting analysis even with missing data.